[tei-council] validation of examples

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 30 Jan 2011, at 17:24, Lou Burnard wrote:

> 
> But this means I am now wondering whether the @break attribute on <lb/> 
> should take values "true" "false" and "unspecified" rather than "yes" 
> "no" and "maybe" as currently proposed.


sounds like existing data.xTruthValue to me:

   <rng:choice>
      <rng:data type="boolean"/>
      <rng:value>unknown</rng:value>
      <rng:value>inapplicable</rng:value>
    </rng:choice>


we should definitely not go back to "yes" and "no" after so much work removing them!
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information and Support Group Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente