[tei-council] validation of examples

[Lou Burnard]

OK, I have revised to "true" "false" and "feasible", added a default 
value ("true") and corrected a silly mistake in the text which no-one 
else noticed

But this means I am now wondering whether the @break attribute on <lb/> 
should take values "true" "false" and "unspecified" rather than "yes" 
"no" and "maybe" as currently proposed.



On 30/01/11 16:18, Martin Holmes wrote:
> +1 from me too, assuming Sebastian's proposal is the one (true, false,
> and feasible, not "feasibly").
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On 11-01-30 07:49 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> On 30 Jan 2011, at 12:38, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I see this is still an orange ticket though. Is there a majority on
>>> Council in favour of adding at least @valid right away?
>>
>> +1 from me (tho see comments on ticket).  Personally I'd leave the
>> expand/show stuff for @rend.
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Information and Support Group Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived