[tei-council] FR nuncles: new element tei:objectType

[Gabriel Bodard]

I was going to ask, what's the process now for creating this element and 
its description? I'd be happy to help compose text for the description 
and examples, if put in touch with whoever is creating the XML.

(Or if someone would like me to learn how to edit the relevant bits of XML?)

G

On 07/01/2011 10:06, Laurent Romary wrote:
> That's for sure. Let's validate this one (the ticket provides more in-
> depth content).
> Laurent (no more coughing, and gently recovering).
>
>
> Le 7 janv. 11 à 10:57, James Cummings a écrit :
>
>> Results so far:
>>
>> Name,	tei:object, 	tei:objectType, 	neither
>> JC, 	No, 	Yes, 	Maybe
>> LR, 	Yes, 	No, 	No
>> SR, 	Yes, 	No, 	No
>> GB, 	No, 	Yes, 	No
>> BB, 	No, 	Yes, 	No
>> EP, 	No, 	Yes, 	No
>> MH, 	No, 	Yes, 	No
>>
>>
>> This looks to me that tei:objectType is the preferred.
>>
>> -James
>>   	
>>
>> On 05/01/11 15:44, James Cummings wrote:
>>> On 05/01/11 14:41, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>>> tei:object: LR, SR
>>>> tei:objectType: MH, GB
>>>
>>> I've re-read the ticket&   comments, and all the emails about it.
>>>    I would like to express more than the above list of
>>> for-one-or-other gives me the ability to.  So I've put up a
>>> little doodle.com poll that you can all fill in:
>>>
>>> http://doodle.com/nu49sr76mg9kirdg
>>>
>>> This allows you to say:
>>> - In favour
>>> - Could live with this option
>>> - Against
>>> for each proposed option.
>>>
>>> In this case I've put in tei:object, tei:objectType and 'neither'
>>> (for those who think both are wrong).
>>>
>>> My vote is:
>>> tei:object: Against (because I think that is a really bad name)
>>> tei:objectType: In Favour
>>> neither: Could live with this option.
>>>
>>> Doodle.com also happens to use a very similar traffic-light
>>> system of green/yellow/red as we do in classifying our tickets.
>>> Might I propose that anytime we want to have a quick show of
>>> hands we use some system like this rather than having to collate
>>> various emails? (We should of course copy the final result back
>>> to the mailing list so it is preserved in the archive.)
>>>
>>> My vote and my two pence,
>>> -James
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr James Cummings, Research Technologies Service
>> OUCS, University of Oxford
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> Laurent Romary
> INRIA&  HUB-IDSL
> laurent.romary at inria.fr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/