[tei-council] draft message to TEI-L on removing elements and attribute from Tite (was Re: update from the TEI Tite task force)
Kevin Hawkins
kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info
Tue Dec 14 17:52:44 EST 2010
On 12/14/2010 10:04 AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
> @Kevin: would you want top ask the TEI-L for feedback on some of the
> tickets?
Before I sent to TEI-L, please make sure I've got the message correct.
###
Colleagues,
A working group commissioned by the TEI Council is proposing revisions
to the TEI Tite specification in order to reconcile the derived version
used by Apex CoVantage as part of the AccessTEI program and the
canonical version on the TEI-C website. We are also investigating bugs
and feature requests detected by users (so far, just me) which are being
collected in SourceForge so that these can be considered by Council as well.
This work involves going through some notes on Tite provided to us by
Apex as they established AccessTEI, as well as some notes on oversights
detected by Perry Trolard and Lou Burnard since version 1.0 of Tite was
published on the TEI-C website.
There are a number of elements and attributes not referenced in the
prose documentation which were accidentally included in the TEI Tite
schema. Since we believe none of these are used by AccessTEI, we are
considering removing them from the canonical Tite schema. However, it
has been pointed out that doing so risks breaking backwards
compatibility for anyone using Tite (or a derived schema) outside of
AccessTEI.
*If you use Tite outside of AccessTEI*, please check over the list of
elements and attributes at:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3136934&group_id=106328&atid=644062
and comment on the ticket if you use any of these. This will help
Council determine which elements and attributes to "save from the
chopping block". Context is most helpful: does a vendor uses these
elements or attributes when encoding for you? Do you use Tite as the
basis for an in-house schema of some sort? Do you have another
situation not described by one of these two scenarios?
Thank you in advance,
Kevin
More information about the tei-council
mailing list