[tei-council] Fwd: bug report for Council, if you like

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Tue Oct 5 13:45:21 EDT 2010

On 5 Oct 2010, at 18:39, Gabriel Bodard wrote:

> I think my instinct would be to go with (b) and, as Sebastian says, 
> worry about paths when and if they're needed. But perhaps the easiest is 
> just to say definitely not (a) (so no validation), but allow individual 
> implementations to assume (b) or (c) as appropriate.

I'd go with this - ie let sleeping dogges lie. Much the easiest solution.
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information and Support Group Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente

More information about the tei-council mailing list