[tei-council] What's next on the TEI publishing thread
mholmes at uvic.ca
Thu Aug 26 11:41:10 EDT 2010
This looks great to me. It might benefit from a final paragraph
specifying roughly what we plan to do as a first step towards this goal
(create a working group comprising e.g. three actively interested
publishers and three TEI-ers? start working directly on identifying
which modules should initially be included in the schema? etc.).
On 10-08-26 06:14 AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
> Hi all,
> You may remember that following the very nice symposium we had in
> Dublin, it was decided to charge a little group among us (Martin,
> Laurent, James, Lou, Sebastian, dan, coordinated efficiently by Kevin)
> to draft what we thought could be a charge to the the SIG on Scholarly
> Publishing (to develop a TEI customization). The document we have is
> accessible from
> and Kevin and I would be happy to get feedback and advice on the next
> step to proceed through.
> Unless there are strong voices against this (will not be counted on
> the number of words; 1 person - 1 voice ;-)), I would like to ask the
> SIG if they share this vision and let volunteers to take up the
> How do you feel with this?
> Laurent Romary
> INRIA& HUB-IDSL
> laurent.romary at inria.fr
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)
Half-Baked Software, Inc.
(mholmes at halfbakedsoftware.com)
martin at mholmes.com
More information about the tei-council