[tei-council] Fwd: suggestions for TEI Tite documentation on AccesTEI portal

[Lou Burnard]

I knew it was about Tite, but I don't recall any "hubbabaloo" about the 
version number on their PDF: I expressed some  concern about the 
licensing phrase, as I thought I already made clear, and those concerns 
have apparently been addressed, so I'm a happy baloo.


On 11/08/10 23:12, O'Donnell, Dan wrote:
> No Lou, I'm not talking about P5. You might recall this was about Tite
> and the version number Apex have put on their PDF. There was a
> hubbabaloo about the fact that they called this 1.1. In fact I think you
> wanted to sue.
>
> They've agreed to call it whatever we want. I imagine their lawyers
> warned them about taking us on.
>
> -dan
>
> On 10-08-11 02:58 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> On 11/08/10 21:51, O'Donnell, Dan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I also told Peggy that the numbering would have to be aligned with the
>>> TEI's official numbering once we've got that set up
>>>
>> If by our "official numbering" you mean the numbering of P5 releases,
>> this has been set up since c. 2005. If you don't, please could you
>> clarify what you do mean?
>>
>> The schemas generated from an ODD by the stylesheets now always specify
>> the version number of the Guidelines they used as well as the date and
>> time. That's a comparatively recent development, so maybe that's what
>> you had in mind?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>