[tei-council] a proposal for a change to ODD (copy of ticket I just put in SF)

[James Cummings]

Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 8 Mar 2010, at 22:50, Lou Burnard wrote:
> 
>> I'd say not -- you probably don't want to remove the example, if  
>> it's a
>> nice one, you (probably) just want the non-existent elements in it to
>> disappear. So you're now into auto-editing examples, yikes.
> you jest, I hope. That way madness lies.

I can envision a system where it says "sorry the default example is no 
longer valid under your schema... but *this one is* and uses this 
element... do you want to replace it?"  But I certainly can't think 
there is any mileage in automatically editing examples.

-James