[tei-council] Criteria for TEI Repository Inclusion

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 2 Mar 2010, at 17:18, Julianne Nyhan wrote:

> even if, as you say TEI-C did not create the e.g. customisation in question
> it seems to me
> that having a centralised access point for customisations could be
> very convenient and useful.

which is not quite the same thing as having ENRICH on SF next to TEI.
Having a nice new catalogue on the TEI web pages would be very sensible

> 
>> One thing to bear in mind is that the TEI SF SVN repository does not
>> give fine-grained access.  If you give access to personX as a developer
>> on it, then they have the ability to add/change/edit the whole of the
>> TEI Guidelines and any of the software above.
> 
> Yikes - in that case I guess it would be too risky. Is it possible to change
> this at all?


not that we know of.

to be honest, the risk is small. everything is in a version control system,
and I (at least) get an email telling me of every commit, so weirdnesses
get picked up pretty quickly. If all else failed, I (or some other
admin)  would get back the state of last known saneness and restore over the top.

--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente