[tei-council] Suppressed text: summary of position (FR 2242434)

[Gabriel Bodard]

Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
> I am sure the drafting rules for the TEI mandate proper English words
>  where possible, Scipio.

What, like <nym>, you mean?

;-)

(The reason I like this less than <superfluous> or similar, apart from 
the possible confusion with <del>, is that it is again a processing 
instruction, not a statement of what the characters on the page actually 
are. Something that means <misplaced> would please me more.)

Are there any actual objections to "superfluous", or are we just toying 
with it now?

G


-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)

Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/