[tei-council] Amber issues: a few stragglers

[Lou]

The following are all bugs which have been outstanding since June.
Could Council members please bend their mighty brains to help close 
them  (the tickets, not the brains)?

1. Ticket 2714682 on the position of biblScope within imprint (last 
updated in April)  "The question at hand is whether the TEI Guidelines 
should recommend anything specific regarding placement of biblScope when 
there's an imprint present. It would also be helpful to say something 
about what to do when you have two page number (or page ranges) given: 
one for the part cited and one for the item at the analytical level."

2. Ticket 2761884 points out that the current content model for 
<encodingDesc> is actually less constrained than the description of it 
in the text would suggest. We need a decision as to which is right and 
we need to change one or the other accordingly. Decision please -- this 
ticket has not been updated since May 24. I think we did discuss it 
since then, and I *think* decided that the text was right and the 
content model wrong, but I can't find any record of that.

3. Ticket 2812295 suggests that we should change the content model of 
<graphic> to resemble that of <figure>; I think this is a mistake, but 
would appreciate further comment for or against.

4. Ticket 2813423 says there is a need for some further discussion about 
the distinction between <textLang> and <langUsage> and where they may 
overlap. I agree, and would appreciate some specific suggestions for 
rewording.