[tei-council] [TEI-L] application/tei+xml -- again (fwd)

[Laurent Romary]

In order to put pressure on everyone, I am about to launch a council  
Telko for early october.
Laurent

Le 14 sept. 09 à 11:49, Lou a écrit :

> Me too. But it would be nice if someone summarized the council's  
> reasoning and added it to the ticket.
>
> Which reminds me to remind council members that it would be really  
> helpful if they could review all outstanding sourceforge tickets and  
> add any comments that may occur to them in the next week or so. As I  
> said a week or so past, it will very soon be time to start work on  
> the next version of P5 if we want a prerelease of it for the MM --  
> in less than two months' time!
>
> Feel free to shout at me or others off list if you've forgotten how  
> to use this pesky sourceforge thingie
>
> Lou
>
>
> there
> Laurent Romary wrote:
>> This seems wise to me.
>> David Sewell <dsewell at virginia.edu> a écrit :
>>> If there is no followup from the user community within a reasonable
>>> time, say the end of next week, to the request for justification I
>>> posted on TEI-L the other day, I suggest we stamp the feature  
>>> request
>>> "Denied" for the time being.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, James Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think I'm with Dan and Peter here.  I don't see that it  
>>>> benefits us
>>>> much... if people want to fetch the TEI-C stylesheets on loading a
>>>> document, there is already a method to do this recognised by most
>>>> browsers (stylesheet processing instruction). As 'Internet Media  
>>>> Types'
>>>> tend to define things like 'xml', 'pdf', 'ogg', 'javascript', and  
>>>> such,
>>>> I think I'm bothered by the fact that TEI is, since P4 at least,  
>>>> XML.
>>>> But yes, I guess if we did it then application/tei+xml is the right
>>>> form. But I just keep doubting that TEI is an application media  
>>>> type,
>>>> rather than just an instance of one of the existing ones (xml).
>>>>
>>>> -James
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Paul O'Donnell wrote:
>>>>> This is my (relatively uninformed question as well). Is XML as  
>>>>> mime type
>>>>> not sufficient? What would be gained by cluttering things up?
>>>>>
>>>>> pboot wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:43:39 +0200, Laurent Romary
>>>>>> <laurent.romary at loria.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a concensus about this in the council? (yes/no)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't say that the earlier thread offers very convincing  
>>>>>> arguments. What
>>>>>> is a browser supposed to do with the information? Fetch  
>>>>>> Sebastian's
>>>>>> stylesheets?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>
>>> --
>>> David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager
>>> ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press
>>> PO Box 801079, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4318 USA
>>> Courier: 310 Old Ivy Way, Suite 302, Charlottesville VA 22903
>>> Email: dsewell at virginia.edu   Tel: +1 434 924 9973
>>> Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>