[tei-council] Precision

[Sebastian Rahtz]

O'Donnell, Dan wrote
> 1) what are the implications for existing P5 docs?
>   
they lose. but its hard to imagine there are any......
> 2) I'm really intrigued by the @target @path but still wonder about it. It seems redundant to me and a dangerous thing to be getting people to split up xpath expressions like this. 
its trying to let people do simple things simply :-}
> You'll need to forgive my lack of research on this because i've got no internet except for my phone. But if the new att set only contained locus, couldn't you nevertheless write an xpath2 expression to find Gaby's example using the same kind of wildcard expression you start your last example with but adding an # to the path?
>
>   
no. # is from the URL world, not the XPath world. could be
id(foo)

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431