[tei-council] dim
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Thu Jun 4 14:18:41 EDT 2009
Gabriel Bodard wrote:
> model.dimLike_sequenceOptional still doesn't seem to allow width
> followed by height, however, which I understood was what had been agreed
> in Lyon.
really? sequenceOptional is what it says, a (ordered)
sequence in which each is optional. we dont have "unorderedOptional"
(mainly cos its hard :-})
> There was even a cunning way to enforce non-repetition in
> there, I think...?
The Lyon minutes don't bear this out, but the SF ticket has a comment by
Lou:
"Date: 2009-04-02 16:21
Sender: louburnard
Define new class model.dimensionPart and use appropriate pattern to enforce
no more than one of each in any order "
but what he had in mind then is not clear.
we can revisit how to implement this. But can you explain
again why it matters to be able to give a different order?
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente
More information about the tei-council
mailing list