[tei-council] [Fwd: Library SIG recommendations]

[Dan O'Donnell]

Please forgive me for pushing this, but we are under time pressure for 
this approval. For general information, there are two ways of reading 
the proposal: the final proposal put together by Perry, or the 
difference file showing the changes. How you read it depends on your 
interest in the pre-changed reason.

So far, there has been one suggestion for change: g

I'm attaching the files again to this email for the convenience of the 
council. The files are identical to those circulated earlier.

Laurent Romary wrote:
> Just a quick comment on this one: it was requested by a participant in 
> the London TEI in Lib. SIG meeting (was it Marcus Bingenheimer?). I 
> think it does not cost much to have it in for specific cases, but may 
> cause damage not to have this tool at hand.
>
>
>
> Le 23 avr. 09 à 21:17, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
>
>>>
>>> * Inclusion of the g element
>> I go with Perry that its unlikely people will use it
>


-- 
Daniel Paul O'Donnell
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge

Chair and CEO, Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org/)
Founding Director, Digital Medievalist Project (http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/)
Chair, Electronic Editions Advisory Board, Medieval Academy of America

Vox: +1 403 329-2377
Fax: +1 403 382-7191 (non-confidental)
Home Page: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tei_tite.odd
Type: text/xml
Size: 51753 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20090424/b09c052a/attachment.xml 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tei_tite.odd.pjt-10Apr2009.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 30885 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20090424/b09c052a/attachment.bin