[tei-council] roadmap / project plan for Roma and ODD processing

[Peter Boot]

Sebastian Rahtz schreef:
> [I'd like to send this to TEI-L, as discussed.
> 
> Comments? ]

> The development of the desktop Vesta processor in Java for ODD (and
> other TEI XML) files necessitated a fork in the

Maybe you need to argue that Vesta is necessary and useful, otherwise it
is not clear what people stand to gain from all this.

> underlying XSLT stylesheets. The Saxon XSLT processor used does not
> support the extension features using by the ODD processing. This
> meant that the stylesheets had to be rewritten to use XSLT 2.0;

You don't explain why you had to use Saxon.

> for processing ODD is created, using the same Java library developed
> for Erewhon, and the new Roma

What is Erewhon?

Should we also ask what type of functionality people are missing in
Roma, or what people hate or like about Roma?

Peter