[tei-council] the constraint element (long)

Fri Mar 27 01:47:12 EDT 2009

I would not support <desc> since it seems that descriptive prose are  
part of each constraint.

As a matter of fact, reading Sebastian's message, it occured to me  
that the element should rather be <constraints> or <constraintGrp>  
then <constraint>, since we would list there all applicable constraints.

Le 26 mars 09 à 23:32, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :

> David Sewell wrote:
>> Just a couple of questions:
>>
>> (1) From the content model below, it looks like <head> is required  
>> as a
>> first child of <content>, but the first example has no <head>.  
>> Should it
>> be optional?
>
> it is optional, as it refers to a model class
>
>> (2) Why <head> rather than <desc>? (not a big deal, just
>> wondering)
>
> true. I am not sure which is better.
>
>
> -- 
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council