[tei-council] [ tei-Feature Requests-2209933 ] content model of 'am'

[Gabriel Bodard]

Multiple use cases in my original ticket, yes.

Some examples of usage (taken from real texts, not just made up exempli 
gratia):

<abbr>Aug<am>g<unclear>g</unclear></am></abbr>
<expan>Augusti tres</expan>

<abbr>Imp<am>pp<supplied>pp</supplied></am></abbr>
<expan>Imperatores quinque</expan>

<abbr>Imp<am>p<sic>p</sic></am></abbr>
<expan>Imperatores duo</expan>

<abbr>lampr<am><unclear><g ref="#leaf"/></unclear></am></abbr>
<expan>lamprotates</expan>

(If we ever did have such a conversation, I clearly didn't agree. ;-) )

Lou Burnard a écrit :
> Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> SourceForge.net a écrit :
>>>> Group: GREEN
>>> It seems that at least transcription-type elements (add, corr, del,
>>  > hi, sic, subst, supplied, unclear) ought to be available within <am>.
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Comment By: Lou Burnard (louburnard)
>>> Date: 2009-03-22 22:49
>>> The proposal is to give it the same content model as <origDate> as per bug
>>> # 2542813
>> Looking at 
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2542813&group_id=106328&atid=644062 
>> I see the suggestion that origDate be given the content model:
>>
>> (text | model.gLike | model.hiLike)*
>>
>> Someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but this would seem not to allow 
>> pPart.transcriptional, which is the most important group required by the 
>> original request for <am>. If so, this doesn't answer the feature 
>> request at all.
> 
> I thought there was a comment somewhere, perhaps not on the ticket 
> though, to the effect that you shouldn't be putting these 
> transcriptional elements inside the <am>? It's only a jumped up kind of 
> <g> after all.
> 
> Do we have a use case somewhere?
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)

Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/