[tei-council] [ tei-Feature Requests-2209933 ] content model of 'am'

[Lou Burnard]

Gabriel Bodard wrote:
> SourceForge.net a écrit :
>>> Group: GREEN
>> It seems that at least transcription-type elements (add, corr, del,
>  > hi, sic, subst, supplied, unclear) ought to be available within <am>.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Comment By: Lou Burnard (louburnard)
>> Date: 2009-03-22 22:49
>> The proposal is to give it the same content model as <origDate> as per bug
>> # 2542813
> 
> Looking at 
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2542813&group_id=106328&atid=644062 
> I see the suggestion that origDate be given the content model:
> 
> (text | model.gLike | model.hiLike)*
> 
> Someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but this would seem not to allow 
> pPart.transcriptional, which is the most important group required by the 
> original request for <am>. If so, this doesn't answer the feature 
> request at all.

I thought there was a comment somewhere, perhaps not on the ticket 
though, to the effect that you shouldn't be putting these 
transcriptional elements inside the <am>? It's only a jumped up kind of 
<g> after all.

Do we have a use case somewhere?