[tei-council] <rendition scheme="xslfo"> ???

David Sewell dsewell at virginia.edu
Thu Mar 26 09:55:09 EDT 2009


To clear up any confusion, Brett in his SF ticket doesn't say anything
about FO--he is just interested in more CSS support within <rendition>.

However... if we truly want to allow <rendition> to contain arbitrary
stylesheet language, should we in fact redefine its child content as

  ( macro.limitedContent | macro.anyXML )

?

I don't use FO enough to know how one might want to apply it to a TEI
document, which is why I asked "How might one use it in practice?"

David

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

> David Sewell wrote:
>
> > But as elements in the fo: namespace cannot be children of <rendition>
> > (without customization), what was the thinking behind including XSL-FO here?
> > How might one use it in practice?
>
> presumably he is assuming we _do_ allow FO as children of
> <rendition>. that would be fairly scary, and make for a
> even bigger scheme.
>
> or we just make the model macro.anyXML and allow any XML markup
> in there (cf constraint)
>
>
>

-- 
David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager
ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press
PO Box 801079, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4318 USA
Courier: 310 Old Ivy Way, Suite 302, Charlottesville VA 22903
Email: dsewell at virginia.edu   Tel: +1 434 924 9973
Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/


More information about the tei-council mailing list