[tei-council] Proposal for SF 2411994, "Define canonical way of referencing TEI element definitions"

[Laurent Romary]

To add something to the documentation, I can mention the report on  
persistent identifiers under http://www.cerl.org/web/en/publications/report_on_persistent_identifiers
Laurent

Le 24 mars 09 à 15:27, David Sewell a écrit :

> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
>> does anyone else do this with their element definitions?
>
> Not that I'm aware. However, people have started assigning DOIs to
> standards documents, for example BSI British Standards:
>
> http://www.crossref.org/crweblog/2007/10/bsi_british_standards_joins_cr.html
>
> It's worth noting that the W3C has a fairly strong bias against non- 
> URI
> schemes for digital object identification and have issued various
> position papers arguing that http:// URIs offer adequate persistence,
> e.g.
>
> "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web" http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
>
> "URNs, Namespaces and Registries"
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/URNsAndRegistries-50.html#args_nri
>
> so it may be that people doing things in the "W3C way" haven't felt a
> need to do anything different.
>
> -- 
> David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager
> ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press
> PO Box 801079, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4318 USA
> Courier: 310 Old Ivy Way, Suite 302, Charlottesville VA 22903
> Email: dsewell at virginia.edu   Tel: +1 434 924 9973
> Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council