[tei-council] AMBER for your action

[Peter Boot]

For most of the maybe/no's I added comments in SourceForge.

Lou Burnard schreef:
> AMBER Feature Requests
> 
> New, not yet discussed:
> 
> 2673045  	new attribute @rational on num
Maybe
> 2672530 	Remove repository element requirement in msIdentifier
Yes
> 2640345 	add first and last page recommandation for biblScope
Maybe
(favour new attributes)
> 2411994 	Define canonical way of referencing TEI element definitions
Yes
We definitely need something
> 
> Old: discussed without resolution
> 
> 2242434 	element for text suppressed by the editor
No
(favour new attr on sic instead)
> 2209933 	content model of 'am' (cf bug 2542813)
Yes
> 2055891 	Placement of schematron rules
Shouldn't we see Sebastian's proposal first?
> 1954920 	@role to be returned to att.naming
Maybe
(favour other name)
> 2493417 	<idno> coverage
Yes
(Seems obvious candidate for discussion in Lyon. I can summarize the 
discussion)
> 
> AMBER Bugs
> 
> New, not yet discussed:
> 
> 2607768  	<figure> should be global
Maybe
> 2355564 	<figure> should be allowed inside <trailer>
Yes
(to 1, not 2. Precise implementation to be discussed)
> 2542813 	origDate should allow more than text content
Yes
> 2526505 	content model of <div> eschews <trailer>
No
(See no immediate need)