[tei-council] Proposal <idno> coverage -SF 2493417

[Laurent Romary]

As a matter of fact, your formulation is wrong. We all disagree - I  
think - with the bad idea of having a mixed-content model. The ideal  
solution would be to recommend <idno> with a structured representation  
of the author's name. We could at least make this explicit as a remark/ 
caution on <author>.

Le 27 janv. 09 à 10:01, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :

> David Sewell wrote:
>> I can't say it is "definitely right" in a Platonic sense. I would say
>> that it is "pragmatically right", or alternatively that it is a
>> solution that as a TEI user I would find clear and easy to implement
>> in my encoding practice.
> I am getting a sense that <author><idno
> type="openid">http://www.foo.bar</idno>John Doe</author>
> is preferred by the majority of people here. I know Lou and I are
> opposed, but
> who else is _against_ it?
>
> -- 
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council