[tei-council] more class rationalizations
John A. Walsh
jawalsh at indiana.edu
Sun Oct 12 17:46:32 EDT 2008
I am definitely in favor of the change proposed below.
-john
--
| John A. Walsh
| Assistant Professor, School of Library and Information Science
| Indiana University, 1320 East Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405
| www: <http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/jawalsh/>
| Voice:812-856-0707 Fax:812-856-2062 <mailto:jawalsh at indiana.edu>
On Oct 12, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Lou's Laptop wrote:
> I'd be very grateful for comments from council members on whether or
> not
> to press ahead with the minor tweak proposed in SF bug #2161974
>
> Text of this bug says: "
>
> The members of att.segLike (cl, c, m, phr, seg, s, w) all inherit
> their
> @type attribute from that class, rather than from att.typed.
> Consequently
> they don't behave like other typed attributes, which inherit this
> attribute from att.typed. Thus most of them don't have a @subtype
> attribute (except for seg, which adds it explicitly) This seems
> confusing and inconsistent. I propose to remove the @type attribute
> from
> att.segLike, remove @subtype from seg, and add all these elements to
> the
> att.typed class.(Another solution might be to make att.segLike a child
> of att.typed, but I prefer the more
> explicit one suggested here)"
>
>
> Can anyone suggest a good reason not to do this?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
More information about the tei-council
mailing list