[tei-council] Guidelines versions online (wrt date)

[Laurent Romary]

A general question (for all reftags) is do we need 1)? since 2) is  
just one instance of many, see:
http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/fr/html/ref-date.html

I would suggest to make disappear all occurances similar to 1)


Le 7 oct. 08 à 18:05, Lou Burnard a écrit :

> Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> I am slightly confused by the different pages available at the  
>> following
>> two URLs:
>>
>> 1) http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/html/ref-date.html
>>
>> 2) http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-date.html
>>
>> The latter seems to be more up-to-date, so I expect that the former  
>> is
>> an old URL that hasn't been removed from the server. Can someone
>> confirm? And should we kill that (or redirect) to avoid confusion?
>
> This is probably something that needs to be pointed out to the people
> who run the Virginian website
>
>
>>
>> However, this leads me to another question: the difference between  
>> the
>> two seems to be that @precision has been added to att.editLike (since
>> (2) is the same in this regard as
>> http://tei.oucs.ox.ac.uk/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-date.html) 
>> .
>> From where, as per the latest precision discussions, it should  
>> shortly
>> be removed again, no? If @precision is a member of att.ranging  
>> instead
>> of att.editLike, then how does date get @precision--since it doesn't
>> need the other attributes in att.ranging?
>
> err, what is att.ranging?
>
> and why are we going to remove @precision from att.editLike?
>
>
>
>
> (This is not, to the best of
>> my knowledge, the <precision/> conversation I am supposed to be  
>> having
>> with Lou this afternoon.)
>>
>>
>
> clearly!
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council