[tei-council] Schematron rules

[Sebastian Rahtz]

John wrote:
>   It seems it  
> might make sense, conceptually, for <constraint> to be a child of  
> <content>.
>   
that's a possibility. but since it also has
to occur in classSpec and attDef and schemaSpec,
I assumed it was easier to keep it simple.

the other problem is that it would not solve
one of my problems, viz the inability to
update/replace/delete _components_
of <content>

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431