[tei-council] [Fwd: META: rethinking usage= of <elementSpec>]

[Lou Burnard]

No harm in that, but there are some specific issues that need to be 
decided before then, e.g. the question of where to put schematron rules 
(SFFR 2055891)



Laurent Romary wrote:
> We do need (probably for the next F2F in the spring) a dedicated  
> session to ODD: present and future. Would you all agree to have such a  
> technico-strategic discussion?
> 
> 
> Le 8 sept. 08 à 17:46, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
> 
>> Laurent Romary wrote:
>>> If I remember well the origins of ODD, this attribute was put on  
>>> elementSpec in case we would want to impose that a given element be  
>>> used only with the corresponding occurance indicator.
>> surely that's covered elsewhere, though, by standard content models?
>>
>> -- 
>> Sebastian Rahtz      Information Manager, Oxford University  
>> Computing Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council