[tei-council] Galway agenda

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Syd Bauman wrote:
> Seriously, I'm thinking of the groups who are really taken aback by
> the size of TEI in the raw, and are excited at the possibility of
> trimming TEI down to size for their own group. Some of them can be
> quite dismayed that they can't document enumerated attribute values
> in Roma, and even if they do, they don't get any readable doc.
>   
I entirely recognize these groups as a concept, but I
have not personally met them in the wild :-}
> Indeed, that version is not so bad (although it, too, could use some
> work). But rather, generate the same documentation from Roma, and
> you'll see what I mean. (Or try some other customization template.)
>   
so if the style for the generated Lite is sort of OK, it
should be easy to make Roma do the same dynamically.
This is obviously an error which I need to work on.
>  One particular
> feature I remember (because I am quite enamored of it) was the
> ability to have both XML and GUI views of the ODD file. Kinda like
> the way the CSSEdit program gives you a GUI but also lets you edit
> CSS code directly.
probably no big deal to add that in some way.

Perhaps you'd like to put together a user survey which
tries to get an idea of what people want changed in Roma,
or added? I fear that we are not the best people to set
priorities.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431