[tei-council] persName question

[Lou Burnard]

James Cummings wrote:
>
> I recognise that this is the problem.  The choices seem to be:
>
> a) Leave it how it is, people do whatever and feel the TEI is flawed
> b) Leave it how it is, but eventually give some suggestions on how to deal with all the cases you and I have mentioned
> c) Change ref (say) to allow multiple URIs but stipulate what this means (alternatives, or multiple people all present, or whatever), and provide guidance for the other possibilities.
>   
This is the right answer. Blatantly.
> d) Change it some other way and provide guidance.
>
> F