[tei-council] clarifications for WD chapter

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Sat Dec 15 12:16:45 EST 2007


I've corrected a couple of typos and other infelicities in these revisions.

I must say though, I find the example a bit strange: to define two 
different mappings, one called "unicode" and one called "standard" seems 
particularly so -- Unicode *is* a standard isn't it?


Syd Bauman wrote:
> OK, I've wrapped these changes into WD, and generated an HTML
> Guidelines for y'all to check out. In particular, see
>
> http://bauman.zapto.org/~syd/temp/Guidelines-web/html/WD.html#D25-20
> and
> http://bauman.zapto.org/~syd/temp/Guidelines-web/html/WD.html#D25-30
>
> Questions:
>
> * When you (CW & MB) wrote "&#x8AAC;" in the <egXML>, did you want
>   the output to show a CJK character or a numeric character
>   reference? 
>
> * The last new bit talks about the case where there are two variant
>   glyphs, neither of which is defined in Unicode. Should we mention
>   that the mechanism discussed is generalizable? I.e. if there are 3
>   or more variant glyphs, you do the same thing: define one as a
>   <char> and the others as <glyph> variants thereof.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>   



More information about the tei-council mailing list