[tei-council] we don't no need stinkin' classification

[Syd Bauman]

> Intriguingly, that reference to a non-existent element has been
> around for many years. I suspect there quite a few other bits of
> rubbish in those <remarks> elements

Indeed.


> Clearly though <classDecl> is currently the only appropriate
> element to replace it by, if we want to retain the remark at all.
> We haven't thought through how @type or @subtype taxonomies get
> defined, I agree.

Foul! They get defined in the ODD. That's what data.enumerated means.