[tei-council] we don't no need stinkin' classification

[Syd Bauman]

>From [P5]/Source/Specs/att.typed.xml:

   ... the <gi>classification</gi> element of the
       <gi>encodingDesc</gi> within ...

I don't have time to research this one right now, and thought someone
else might want to take a crack at it before I get to it, which is
likely to be tomorrow afternoon or Wed morning. (In case the problem
isn't obvious: not only doesn't P5 have a <classification> element in
the <encodingDesc>, it doesn't have one at all! And neither did P4.
And the answer isn't just "oh, it's supposed to be <classDecl>", I
don't think, as I'm not sure how one could formally define a typology
for type= or subtype= using <taxonomy>, as <category> is supposed to
be pointed at with a URI, and type= isn't a URI.)