[tei-council] next release

[Lou Burnard]

Arianna Ciula wrote:
> 
> 
> James Cummings wrote:
>>> If we really want to do this (and it does seem a bit odd to me to be 
>>> formalising deprecation in a formal description), the place to do 
>>> this is in the <remarks> element. That at any rate is where we did it 
>>> last time: cf the @hand attribute on <hand> in the P4 Guidelines -- a 
>>> pretty clear precedent.
>>
>> Then it seems we have a precedent, and that is the way to do it.
>>
> 
> Would this mean that when I download my ODD from Roma I get all the 
> remarks too?

Certainly, so far as I know.  Why would Roma throw them away?


> I wander whether it would be better if, in practice, all the deprecated 
> uses could be collected somewhere else, still linked to the specific 
> elements and documented in the full ODD, but possibly extracted from it 
> by default in Roma.

"All the deprecated uses"? err, can someone tell me how many there are 
or are likely to be? I'm not aware of there being any right now... if 
it's more than half a dozen we're doing something wrong!