[tei-council] review of IM

[Arianna Ciula]

Lou Burnard wrote:
> I had assumed we would continue using TRAC.  Someone needs to clear out 
> the now superannuated tickets, is all.

But isn't the all point of software like trac to keep a documentation of 
how things have been decided/fixed?

I would rather close (not wipe away) the tickets related to P5 1.0 and 
open a new set, but let's see what the new council will say.
Sometimes I believe a wiki style would be more useful for issues that 
require a report of previous discussion and are more narrative than 
simply fix A or go from A to B.

By the way, nice to see the new site up.

Arianna
> 
> Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> Syd Bauman wrote:
>>   
>>> I am not very fond of it, but neither do I know of anything better.
>>> Perhaps a different organization of tickets, etc., would make it more
>>> usable. 
>>>     
>> I am wondering about wiping it and starting over (having
>> saved the things noted for 1.1 already). Then we could
>> discuss again how to use it.
>>
>> I am worried that half the council will be new next week [1],
>> we'll have a new chairman, and we won't meet for 5 months
>> or so. Its a very good scenario for things to fall
>> through cracks.
>>
>> Equally, I want the new chairman to feel free to dictate
>> new working methods. So I don't want to decide anything
>> now,  just vaguely raising the matter.
>>
>> [1] I may not be here myself, in fact, unless the Board renews
>> its mandate of me.
>>
>>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

-- 
Dr Arianna Ciula
Research Associate
Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
Strand
London WC2R 2LS (UK)
Tel: +44 (0)20 78481945
http://staff.cch.kcl.ac.uk/~aciula/