[tei-council] NH final but typos

[Syd Bauman]

> I carried out all council's wishes, 

Am I mis-remembering, or wasn't one of the major requests of Council
to re-divide this chapter up by conformance level? 


> except replacing the Pinsky quotation with Lehrer: it turned out
> the Pinsky quote was a better example for two things than the
> Lehrer, so I left it in.

Can you explain what it was better for? As the Pinsky quote does not
demonstrate <l> / <said> overlap (which is a great starting point),
I'm not too fond of it.


> I also redid the example: New York Hit and Run with an example that

I like the new example better.


> I also provided a syntax diagram to make the distinction between
> the two interpretations clear.

I think that's excellent! It could have been demonstrated with just
   fast (trains and planes)    vs    (fast trains) and planes
but the diagram is better. However, if you have the chance to shore
up the vertical spacing, readers will appreciate it. (The tree is
just too tall. :-)


> Finally, I substituted the Pinsky quotation for the "modified"
> passage from Lehrer's Werner von Braun. The reasons were that
> Pinsky could be used to show the feature without modification, the
> Lehrer example was linguistically dodgy, IMO, and there were
> validation problems with it.

I don't see what was "dodgy", but yes, it caused validation problems,
as I pointed out last month. I think most people would say the schema
needs to be fixed, but we obviously can't do that now!