[tei-council] review of IM

[Lou Burnard]

Syd Bauman wrote:
>
> I can certainly give it a try. Given that the extraction process is
> so simple, it shouldn't be that hard to write. (Famous last words,
> eh? :-)
> Does anyone think we should *not* include this?
>
>
>   
Me. Not in this version, thank you.


>
> I also think we should be using <name> for classes, macros,
> datatypes, etc.
>
>   
Current house style is to use <ident> with @type for all three of the 
above.

>   
>>> * IMGS/p[8], rest of para: Why are we recommending this only for
>>>   DTDs? Just because it is hard for us to do for RELAX NG doesn't
>>>   mean we should not recommend ODD processors do this.
>>>       
>> true.
>>     
>
> OK, so here's a crack at a complete re-write:
>   
I would prefer not to add this until we've had more time to check that 
it is actually useful.
So that it doesn't get lost, I've put it into the source as a comment 
for now.