[tei-council] comments on "Representation of Primary Sources"

Christian Wittern cwittern at gmail.com
Sun Oct 28 06:59:47 EST 2007


Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>>  
> This is OK for the earlier examples, and I have made the suggested 
> changes there, but it wouldn't work for the later examples where <am> 
> and <ex> are introduced. This has also been the subject of some debate 
> on one of the lists recently, so I'm  reluctant to rock this part of 
> the boat without further discussion -- James?
>
>
Yes, indeed, for the <am> and <ex> examples this is not needed, they can 
stay as they are.  Many thanks, this looks now fine to me.

Christian

-- 

 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN



More information about the tei-council mailing list