[tei-council] comments on "Representation of Primary Sources"
Christian Wittern
cwittern at gmail.com
Sun Oct 28 06:59:47 EST 2007
Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>>
> This is OK for the earlier examples, and I have made the suggested
> changes there, but it wouldn't work for the later examples where <am>
> and <ex> are introduced. This has also been the subject of some debate
> on one of the lists recently, so I'm reluctant to rock this part of
> the boat without further discussion -- James?
>
>
Yes, indeed, for the <am> and <ex> examples this is not needed, they can
stay as they are. Many thanks, this looks now fine to me.
Christian
--
Christian Wittern
Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
More information about the tei-council
mailing list