[tei-council] Conformance inconsistency

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Sat Oct 27 07:04:05 EDT 2007


Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Syd Bauman wrote:
>   
>> Unlike us, she wants them all in a single <div>,
>> and plans to differentiate using type=. But lo! Unlike <bibl> and
>> <biblStruct>, <biblFull> doesn't have a type=. 
>>     
> So she should lobby via the official route for a change
> to the TEI, to get @type added to <biblFull>, no?
> in the meanwhile, she adds my:type to get the
> effect she wants.
>
> Though why she just doesn't use <biblStruct> passim,
> I know not :-}
>
>   
She could also put them into a separate <listBibl>, which does have @type.

Why would you want to mix biblFull and biblStruct in the same list 
anyway? Makes no sense.



More information about the tei-council mailing list