[tei-council] vote on NH

[Dan O'Donnell]

On Mon, 2007-01-10 at 19:17 +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Dan O'Donnell wrote:
> > Having proposed some of the changes, I have a tendency to lean to A2;
> > but I'm really concerned about the amount of time it might take. So I
> > think my vote needs to be 2--delete for 5.0. I think we need this, but I
> > don't want it to be ragged for the launch.
> >   
> My brain agrees with Dan, though my heart says A2. I worry that we will
> spend the rest of October discussing NH (and pilcrows) until the last
> minute, and something else will get neglected.

I feel exactly the same way: I think it is important and good work but
just a step too far from done to go out with the rest at this stage.
Like, dare I say it, the choice and app/rdg business ;Þ

I wonder if we shouldn't seriously consider it was a distinct U-series
publication. That removes the initial pressure.

> 
-- 
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Chair, Text Encoding Initiative <http://www.tei-c.org/>
Director, Digital Medievalist Project <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>
Associate Professor and Chair of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Vox: +1 403 329 2378
Fax: +1 403 382-7191
Homepage: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/