[tei-council] vote on NH
Syd Bauman
Syd_Bauman at Brown.edu
Sun Sep 30 21:04:31 EDT 2007
Well, then. I have to say I'm a little less inclined to spend the
rest of my night working on this chapter if it might be summarily
voted out.
I had not yet gotten to considering whether any of the suggestions
Sebastian & Dan made in the posts Christian mentions could be gotten
to tonight, but I think that's a moot point now.
I've tried to change the examples, as Sebastian suggested, to use
elements from another namespace, so they can be within <egXML> and
thus both be validated and be pretty color styled in the output. So
this has led, after a day of wrangling with our validation process,
to three significant technical problems in the current state[1].
1) In order to validate elements from the nh: namespace in the
examples, the new pattern anyNH would have to be permitted not
just at the root level of <egXML>, but within the content of any
teix: element (other than empty ones).[2] Thus at the moment the
nh: elements are flagged as invalid by our single-pass validation
tests, but as valid by oNVDL.
2) The XHTML output of examples that have elements from other
namespaces does not look good. Rather than using a prefix, there
is an xmlns= attribute on the elements in question. (And, perhaps
because of it, the whitespace of their attributes isn't handled
well.) I haven't figured out how Sebastian has gotten this to work
for MathML (see example immediately before
http://tei.oucs.ox.ac.uk/P5/Guidelines-web-beta/en/html/FT.html#FTGRA),
and it isn't as much of a problem for for SVG (see example near
the end of that same section).
3) As mentioned in previous post, <said> is not currently permitted
in <s>.
Sebastian: one <bibl> reference was missed. I encoded it as a ptr to
NH-BIBL-9, which xml:id= I've added to my copy of BIB.
Notes
-----
[1] For me, locally, not checked in. Anyone who wants to read the
XHTML can do so by looking at
http://bauman.zapto.org/~syd/temp/P5/Guidelines-web-beta/en/html/NH.html
in a browser. Lou, you can grab the source from the P5 directory
on that server: http://bauman.zapto.org/~syd/temp/P5/. The files
that would need to be checked in are:
M 3453 Source/Guidelines/en/BIB-Bibliography.xml
M 3453 Source/Guidelines/en/NH-Non-hierarchical.xml
M 3453 p5odds.odd
M 3453 Utilities/makeexnames.xsl
M 3453 Makefile
M 3453 p5odds-ex.odd
M 3453 schemas.xml
Status against revision: 3453
[2] I was just about to start thinking about whether this is doable
at all, and if so how -- but if we're not going to have an NH,
then we may not have to solve this problem at all, let alone
right now.
Christian Wittern writes:
> Council members,
>
> It seems to me we have to come to a decision about the chapter NH. First,
> we need to decide whether to include what is currently in NH into P5 1.0.
> If we decide to do so, we need to decide where to put it and what changes
> need to be done.
>
> Since time is running fast and we have to be done with everything by the end
> of the month, I propose to call a vote on the following:
>
> A) include NH into P5 1.0
> A1) leave it as chapter by itself without much changes in the arrangement
> of material
> A2) re-arrange the content, taking Dan's proposal as a starting point
> (see
> http://lists.village.virginia.edu/pipermail/tei-council/2007/008524.html)
> A3) re-arrange the content, using Sebastian's proposal as a starting
> point: (see
> http://lists.village.virginia.edu/pipermail/tei-council/2007/008565.html)
>
> B) postpone NH and schedule it as a work item for P5 1.1
>
>
> Voting for A would require indicating a preference for A1, A2 or A3
>
> I will wait for amendments to this proposal until Monday Oct. 1st midnight
> GMT and then close the vote 48 hours later. If this sounds acceptable, we
> should be ready to implement the outcome immediately afterwards.
>
> All the best,
>
> Christian
More information about the tei-council
mailing list