[tei-council] Comments on "Documentation Elements"
lou.burnard at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Sun Sep 23 18:36:19 EDT 2007
Laurent Romary wrote:
> [I read the HTML version under
> Replace [for sake of simplifiation]:
> - "which are to be documented and also declared" by
> - "which are to be declared"
Done (sorry, just missed the release though!)
> I would move the presentation of <eg> to "Elements available TEI
> documents" not far from <q>, <quote> <cit>and the like. At least a
> sentence should be adde to the paragraph "The <eg> element may be
> used...", i.e. "When an exemple is actually quoted from a source, the
> <cit> element should be referably used." And should not <eg> be also a
> member of model.qLike (since it is a specialized form of <q>).
I am not sure what you're suggesting. It sounds as if you think <eg>
should be included in the core module, rather than just the tagdocs
module: is that so? You may be right, but this is quite a large change
to make now. It might be worth adding a sentence to the core module to
point out that there are special purpose elements for
quoting/documenting xml source, which are available from the tagdocs
module. But on balance I don't think it would be good to separate these
special purpose elements out from the other odd elements: you will
always need them together.
> Remove extraneous slash in the specDesc of specDesc (bug?)
> Same bug with the speDesc's of specGrpRef and attRef
This is a formatting matter: one of James' or Sebastian's bright ideas
which seems to have confused several people...
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
More information about the tei-council