[tei-council] FW: Further update on PH

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Thu Sep 20 05:38:09 EDT 2007


Arianna Ciula wrote:
>
> I think the that reasons in favor of splitting the coordinates into 
> attributes seem robust enough now:
> - easier to extend the schema for v1.1
> - easier to process for presentation
> - more conventional names (my fault for not recognizing this) ]
good!
> I think we must be careful here. On one hand we need to allow for some 
> sort of description (therefore <desc> or <note> on zones and surfaces 
> would be useful), but at the same time we don't want to re-invent 
> metadata for images.
> So as we do elsewhere in the guidelines, i think we should point to 
> appropriate metadata for images when the purpose goes beyond the 
> simple connection image/text and brief description of the image content. ]
ok, so long as provide the mechanism for pointers. no point having 
<bibl> records
or <surrogates> around, if we cannot trivially join them up. And by 
"trivially" I mean
"preferably not using standoff linking". Some meals are too rich.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431



More information about the tei-council mailing list