[tei-council] FW: Further update on PH
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Thu Sep 20 05:38:09 EDT 2007
Arianna Ciula wrote:
>
> I think the that reasons in favor of splitting the coordinates into
> attributes seem robust enough now:
> - easier to extend the schema for v1.1
> - easier to process for presentation
> - more conventional names (my fault for not recognizing this) ]
good!
> I think we must be careful here. On one hand we need to allow for some
> sort of description (therefore <desc> or <note> on zones and surfaces
> would be useful), but at the same time we don't want to re-invent
> metadata for images.
> So as we do elsewhere in the guidelines, i think we should point to
> appropriate metadata for images when the purpose goes beyond the
> simple connection image/text and brief description of the image content. ]
ok, so long as provide the mechanism for pointers. no point having
<bibl> records
or <surrogates> around, if we cannot trivially join them up. And by
"trivially" I mean
"preferably not using standoff linking". Some meals are too rich.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
More information about the tei-council
mailing list