[tei-council] Editorial work after 17 sept

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Lou Burnard wrote:
>
> The original bibliog was conceived as a demonstration of how <bibl> 
> worked and as a reading list of useful relevant stuff.
if its to be that, then it needs serious work (as mentioned approx twice 
a year for the last N years....).
> It was not conceived as the kind of formal academic bibliog you are 
> thinking of here -- the kind that collects all the works cited in the 
> body of the text.
yes please..... in some ways easier than the reading list.
> think I agree that a bibliog of the latter kind would indeed be an 
> improvement, but would represent a *lot* of work. Should it also 
> include the source for all the cited examples?
ideally, but that _would_ be a big task to turn the comments into useful 
<bibl>s


-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431