[tei-council] Proposal for choice, model.pPartEdit, and model.choicePart

[Daniel O'Donnell]

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:03 -0600, Daniel O'Donnell wrote:
> > 
> > The <supplied> element should be retained for text now illegible or
> > lost through damage but assumed originally to have been in the
> > manuscript (what used to be supplied reason="illegible|damage"), and
> > for the expansion of abbreviations -- these are both arguably things
> > which are present in the manuscript, but where a degree of
> > interpretation is required on the part of the editor.
> 
> I like this. It is a little bit more narrow than the current use of
> substitution 

Sorry: <sic>substitution</sic><edInt>supplied</edInt> (or should that be
corr?)

> > 
-- 
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Department Chair and Associate Professor of English
Director, Digital Medievalist Project http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/
Chair, Text Encoding Initiative http://www.tei-c.org/

Department of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Vox +1 403 329-2377
Fax +1 403 382-7191
Email: daniel.odonnell at uleth.ca
WWW: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/