[tei-council] divWrapping: summary and question
James Cummings
James.Cummings at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Wed Jul 18 09:30:38 EDT 2007
Syd Bauman wrote:
> JW> [a]
> LB> [a]
> CT> [a]
> LR> [a]
>
> JC> model.divWrapper = argument byline dateline docAuthor docDate
> JC> model.divTop = model.divWrapper model.divTopPart
> JC> model.divTopPart = head opener salute epigraph
> JC> model.divBottom = model.divWrapper model.divBottomPart
> JC> model.divBottomPart = closed signed trailer ps
>
> Absolutely! I proposed this as a straw-man "overkill" solution last
> time around, but since no one bit (including myself), didn't even
> bother with it this time.
Ah, maybe that is why it seemed fairly familiar to me.
> One of the reasons I'm kinda glad everyone is going for solution (a)
> is that we can leave the classes as they are now, and if & when we
> ever decide we do need to refer to 'em, we can create divTopPart w/o
> having to muck with content models.
Ok, I'm happy to go with solution a) then with the proviso that we should
re-examine it before P5 1.1. ;-)
-James
--
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk
More information about the tei-council
mailing list