[tei-council] TRAC ticket 329 -- time to close?
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jul 9 18:27:37 EDT 2007
Lou Burnard wrote:
> Actually, I thought we *did* decide to require the user to load a
> different module if they wanted ISO dates. But this was in Kyoto and
> the written record is not clear on the matter.
I concur, we did specify that; but when Syd reported the action done
he said something to the effect that he had not implemented that bit,
and we didn't say nowt at the time. Then again I may be mis-remembering.
> I don't remember you advancing this argument, but someone else
> (Sylvain Loiseau) remarked to me the other day that he found the
> mixture of techdoc things and specifically meta things in the TD
> chapter very confusing.
do you mean <att>, <val>, <tag> and <gi> should go in the core, or in a
new module?
now you mention it, it _would_ be good to hoick them out of TD.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
More information about the tei-council
mailing list