rend= not global? (was "Re: Fwd: [tei-council] DRAFT Agenda for ...")

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Syd Bauman wrote:
>> Given that 95% of the elements *can* occur in the text, it would be
>> a pain to add all of them to a "att.renderable" class, leaving 5%
>> *not* members of that class. Isn't it easier to let sleeping dogs
>> lie, and accept that its a bit weird?
>>     
>
> Yes, it is easier. That doesn't mean it's better or the right thing
> to do
>   
if we are going to add more or less all elements to an explicit
class, might as well scrap implict membership of
att.global entirely and do @xml:id and @n (etc)
in the normal way?

i'm easy. just seems like a distraction to me.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431