[tei-council] agenda items for Council telecon on 2007-06-15 at 1200 UTC

[Wittern Christian]

Syd Bauman wrote:
> First, I just want to verify that the upcoming conference call is
> scheduled for this coming Friday 15 June at 12:00 UTC[1].
>   
Yes, that is correct.

> I have revised his extension a little; here it is.
>
> We add a references= attribute to <attDef> which could be used only if
> the datatype of the attribute being defined was data.pointer.[2] The
> references= attribute itself has a datatype of data.name, and gives
> the name of the element type to which the pointer attribute being
> defined should point. The ODD processor would generate the Schematron
> needed to validate that instances of the pointer attribute actually
> pointed to elements of the type named on references=.[3]
>   
So the question seems to be whether to add this @references and what 
implications this might have.  I think this is more suitable to 
discussion here (with some examples and running code), rather than 
spending time on this at the call.

> Problem: what would the message in the generated content of the
> <sch:assert> or <sch:report> be? I haven't even thought about it yet,
> but I doubt it's a show-stopper. This does, however, violate the "no
> new additions post Berlin" idea. 
>   
This will not so much be a new item, but rather part of your dealing 
with the existing action item, so I do not see how this is affected by 
that rule.


Christian


-- 
 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN