[tei-council] incompatible datatypes for same-named attributes

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Syd Bauman wrote:
>
>> BTW, Syd, note the remaining "targets". is that deliberate, or a
>> smidgeon of unfinished business?
>>     
>
> Completely deliberate, and importantly so. (A targets= attribute
> requires 2 or more pointers as its value.)
>   
isnt that catered for with our new list and its minOccurs/maxOccurs?

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431