[Fwd: Re: [tei-council] Conformance draft: namespace purity]
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Tue Apr 3 14:20:23 EDT 2007
Syd Bauman wrote:
> I think that (given the non-TEI namespace for new element
> requirement, which I think is a bad idea) this all makes sense,
> except that I still lean towards making the default be a valid (if
> useless) namespace URI. Makes it a lot easier to use Roma for quick
> testing, a use to which webRoma is often put, I think.
>
you may be right. anyway, I'll work on the stuff
after Easter so that we can experiment.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
More information about the tei-council
mailing list